Anup K Ghosh

One of the hardest challenges for companies and their officers is determining how much to spend on cybersecurity and the appropriate allocation of those resources. Security “investments” are a cost on the ledger, and as such, companies do not want to spend more on security than they have to. The question most boards have is “how much security is enough?” and “how good is our security program?” Most CISOs and SOC teams have a hard time answering these questions for a lack of data and framework to measure risk and compare with other similar sized companies. This paper presents a data-driven practical approach to assessing and scoring cybersecurity risk that can be used to allocate resources efficiently a nd mitigate cybersecurity risk in areas that need it the most. We combine both static and dynamic measures of risk to give a composite score more indicative of cybersecurity risk over static measures alone.

View More Papers

EdgeTDC: On the Security of Time Difference of Arrival...

Marc Roeschlin (ETH Zurich, Switzerland), Giovanni Camurati (ETH Zurich, Switzerland), Pascal Brunner (ETH Zurich, Switzerland), Mridula Singh (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Srdjan Capkun (ETH Zurich, Switzerland)

Read More

DiffCSP: Finding Browser Bugs in Content Security Policy Enforcement...

Seongil Wi (KAIST), Trung Tin Nguyen (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security, Saarland University), Jihwan Kim (KAIST), Ben Stock (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Sooel Son (KAIST)

Read More

RAI2: Responsible Identity Audit Governing the Artificial Intelligence

Tian Dong (Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Shaofeng Li (Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Guoxing Chen (Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Minhui Xue (CSIRO's Data61), Haojin Zhu (Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Zhen Liu (Shanghai Jiao Tong University)

Read More