Cem Topcuoglu (Northeastern University), Andrea Martinez (Florida International University), Abbas Acar (Florida International University), Selcuk Uluagac (Florida International University), Engin Kirda (Northeastern University)

Operating Systems (OSs) play a crucial role in shaping user perceptions of security and privacy. Yet, the distinct perception of different OS users received limited attention from security researchers. The two most dominant operating systems today are MacOS and Microsoft Windows. Although both operating systems contain advanced cybersecurity features that have made it more difficult for attackers to launch their attacks and compromise users, the folk wisdom suggests that users regard MacOS as being the more secure operating system among the two. However, this common belief regarding the comparison of these two operating systems, as well as the mental models behind it, have not been studied yet.

In this paper, by conducting detailed surveys with a large number of MacOS and Windows users (n = 208) on Amazon Mechanical Turk, we aim to understand the differences in perception among MacOS and Windows users concerning the cybersecurity and privacy of these operating systems. Our results confirm the folk wisdom and show that many Windows and MacOS users indeed perceive MacOS as a more secure and private operating system compared to Windows, basing their belief on reputation rather than technical decisions. Additionally, we found that MacOS users often take fewer security measures, influenced by a strong confidence in their system’s malware protection capabilities. Moreover, our analysis highlights the impact of the operating system’s reputation and the primary OS used on users’ perceptions of security and privacy. Finally, our qualitative analysis revealed many misconceptions such as being MacOS malware-proof. Overall, our findings suggest the need for more focused security training and OS improvements and show the shreds of evidence that the mental model of users in this regard is a vital process to predict new attack surfaces and propose usable solutions.

View More Papers

Merge/Space: A Security Testbed for Satellite Systems

M. Patrick Collins (USC Information Sciences Institute), Alefiya Hussain (USC Information Sciences Institute), J.P. Walters (USC Information Sciences Institute), Calvin Ardi (USC Information Sciences Institute), Chris Tran (USC Information Sciences Institute), Stephen Schwab (USC Information Sciences Institute)

Read More

Evaluating LLMs Towards Automated Assessment of Privacy Policy Understandability

Keika Mori (Deloitte Tohmatsu Cyber LLC, Waseda University), Daiki Ito (Deloitte Tohmatsu Cyber LLC), Takumi Fukunaga (Deloitte Tohmatsu Cyber LLC), Takuya Watanabe (Deloitte Tohmatsu Cyber LLC), Yuta Takata (Deloitte Tohmatsu Cyber LLC), Masaki Kamizono (Deloitte Tohmatsu Cyber LLC), Tatsuya Mori (Waseda University, NICT, RIKEN AIP)

Read More

Inaudible Adversarial Perturbation: Manipulating the Recognition of User Speech...

Xinfeng Li (Zhejiang University), Chen Yan (Zhejiang University), Xuancun Lu (Zhejiang University), Zihan Zeng (Zhejiang University), Xiaoyu Ji (Zhejiang University), Wenyuan Xu (Zhejiang University)

Read More

TrustSketch: Trustworthy Sketch-based Telemetry on Cloud Hosts

Zhuo Cheng (Carnegie Mellon University), Maria Apostolaki (Princeton University), Zaoxing Liu (University of Maryland), Vyas Sekar (Carnegie Mellon University)

Read More