Andrew Searles (University of California Irvine), Renascence Tarafder Prapty (University of California Irvine), Gene Tsudik (University of California Irvine)

Since 2003, CAPTCHAS have been widely used as a barrier against bots, while simultaneously annoying great multitudes of users worldwide. As the use of CAPTCHAS grew, techniques to defeat or bypass them kept improving. In response, CAPTCHAS themselves evolved in terms of sophistication and diversity, becoming increasingly difficult to solve for both bots and humans. Given this long-standing and still-ongoing arms race, it is important to investigate usability, solving performance, and user perceptions of modern CAPTCHAS. In this work, we do so via a large scale (over 3,600 distinct users) 13-month realworld user study and post-study survey. The study, conducted at a large public university, is based on a live account creation and password recovery service with currently prevalent CAPTCHA type: reCAPTCHAv2.

Results show that, with more attempts, users improve in solving checkbox CAPTCHAS. For website developers and user study designers, results indicate that the website context, i.e., whether the service is password recovery or account creation, directly influences (with statistically significant differences) CAPTCHA solving times. We consider the impact of participants’ major and education level, showing that certain majors exhibit better performance, while, in general, education level has a direct impact on solving time. Unsurprisingly, we discover that participants find image CAPTCHAS to be annoying, while checkbox CAPTCHAS are perceived as easy. We also show that, rated via System Usability Scale (SUS), image CAPTCHAS are viewed as “OK”, while checkbox CAPTCHAS are viewed as “good”.

Finally, we also explore the cost and security of reCAPTCHAv2 and conclude that it comes at an immense cost and offers practically no security. Overall, we believe that this study’s results prompt a natural conclusion: reCAPTCHAv2 and similar reCAPTCHA technology should be deprecated.

View More Papers

MALintent: Coverage Guided Intent Fuzzing Framework for Android

Ammar Askar (Georgia Institute of Technology), Fabian Fleischer (Georgia Institute of Technology), Christopher Kruegel (University of California, Santa Barbara), Giovanni Vigna (University of California, Santa Barbara), Taesoo Kim (Georgia Institute of Technology)

Read More

PhantomLiDAR: Cross-modality Signal Injection Attacks against LiDAR

Zizhi Jin (Zhejiang University), Qinhong Jiang (Zhejiang University), Xuancun Lu (Zhejiang University), Chen Yan (Zhejiang University), Xiaoyu Ji (Zhejiang University), Wenyuan Xu (Zhejiang University)

Read More

Five Word Password Composition Policy

Sirvan Almasi (Imperial College London), William J. Knottenbelt (Imperial College London)

Read More

Passive Inference Attacks on Split Learning via Adversarial Regularization

Xiaochen Zhu (National University of Singapore & Massachusetts Institute of Technology), Xinjian Luo (National University of Singapore & Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence), Yuncheng Wu (Renmin University of China), Yangfan Jiang (National University of Singapore), Xiaokui Xiao (National University of Singapore), Beng Chin Ooi (National University of Singapore)

Read More