Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

CLIK on PLCs! Attacking Control Logic with Decompilation and...

Sushma Kalle (University of New Orleans), Nehal Ameen (University of New Orleans), Hyunguk Yoo (University of New Orleans), Irfan Ahmed (Virginia Commonwealth University)

Read More

Demo #13: Attacking LiDAR Semantic Segmentation in Autonomous Driving

Yi Zhu (State University of New York at Buffalo), Chenglin Miao (University of Georgia), Foad Hajiaghajani (State University of New York at Buffalo), Mengdi Huai (University of Virginia), Lu Su (Purdue University) and Chunming Qiao (State University of New York at Buffalo)

Read More

Dissecting American Fuzzy Lop – A FuzzBench Evaluation

Andrea Fioraldi (EURECOM), Alessandro Mantovani (EURECOM), Dominik Maier (TU Berlin), Davide Balzarotti (EURECOM)

Read More

HeadStart: Efficiently Verifiable and Low-Latency Participatory Randomness Generation at...

Hsun Lee (National Taiwan University), Yuming Hsu (National Taiwan University), Jing-Jie Wang (National Taiwan University), Hao Cheng Yang (National Taiwan University), Yu-Heng Chen (National Taiwan University), Yih-Chun Hu (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), Hsu-Chun Hsiao (National Taiwan University)

Read More