Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

A Heuristic Approach to Detect Opaque Predicates that Disrupt...

Yu-Jye Tung (University of California, Irvine), Ian Harris (University of California Irvine)

Read More

Binary Code Patching: An Ancient Art Refined for the...

Dr. Barton P. Miller (Vilas Distinguished Achievement Professor at The University of Wisconsin-Madison)

Read More

Trust and Privacy Expectations during Perilous Times of Contact...

Habiba Farzand (University of Glasgow), Florian Mathis (University of Glasgow), Karola Marky (University of Glasgow), Mohamed Khamis (University of Glasgow)

Read More

Detecting Obfuscated Function Clones in Binaries using Machine Learning

Michael Pucher (University of Vienna), Christian Kudera (SBA Research), Georg Merzdovnik (SBA Research)

Read More