Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

PoF: Proof-of-Following for Vehicle Platoons

Ziqi Xu (University of Arizona), Jingcheng Li (University of Arizona), Yanjun Pan (University of Arizona), Loukas Lazos (University of Arizona, Tucson), Ming Li (University of Arizona, Tucson), Nirnimesh Ghose (University of Nebraska–Lincoln)

Read More

Tetrad: Actively Secure 4PC for Secure Training and Inference

Nishat Koti (IISc Bangalore), Arpita Patra (IISc Bangalore), Rahul Rachuri (Aarhus University, Denmark), Ajith Suresh (IISc, Bangalore)

Read More

Blaze: A Framework for Interprocedural Binary Analysis

Matthew Revelle, Matt Parker, Kevin Orr (Kudu Dynamics)

Read More