Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

Short Paper: Declarative Demand-Driven Reverse Engineering

Yihao Sun, Jeffrey Ching, Kristopher Micinski (Department of Electical Engineering and Computer Science, Syracuse University)

Read More

Evaluating Susceptibility of VPN Implementations to DoS Attacks Using...

Fabio Streun (ETH Zurich), Joel Wanner (ETH Zurich), Adrian Perrig (ETH Zurich)

Read More

CBAT: A Comparative Binary Analysis Tool

Chloe Fortuna (STR), JT Paasch (STR), Sam Lasser (Draper), Philip Zucker (Draper), Chris Casinghino (Jane Street), Cody Roux (AWS)

Read More

An In-depth Analysis of Duplicated Linux Kernel Bug Reports

Dongliang Mu (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Yuhang Wu (Pennsylvania State University), Yueqi Chen (Pennsylvania State University), Zhenpeng Lin (Pennsylvania State University), Chensheng Yu (George Washington University), Xinyu Xing (Pennsylvania State University), Gang Wang (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)

Read More