Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

Repttack: Exploiting Cloud Schedulers to Guide Co-Location Attacks

Chongzhou Fang (University of California, Davis), Han Wang (University of California, Davis), Najmeh Nazari (University of California, Davis), Behnam Omidi (George Mason University), Avesta Sasan (University of California, Davis), Khaled N. Khasawneh (George Mason University), Setareh Rafatirad (University of California, Davis), Houman Homayoun (University of California, Davis)

Read More

PISE: Protocol Inference using Symbolic Execution and Automata Learning

Ron Marcovich, Orna Grumberg, Gabi Nakibly (Technion, Israel Institute of Technology)

Read More

Ghidra: Is Newer Always Better?

Jonathan Crussell (Sandia National Laboratories)

Read More

Chosen-Instruction Attack Against Commercial Code Virtualization Obfuscators

Shijia Li (College of Computer Science, NanKai University and the Tianjin Key Laboratory of Network and Data Security Technology), Chunfu Jia (College of Computer Science, NanKai University and the Tianjin Key Laboratory of Network and Data Security Technology), Pengda Qiu (College of Computer Science, NanKai University and the Tianjin Key Laboratory of Network and Data…

Read More