Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

Beyond the Bytes: Understanding the Limitations of Intrinsic Binary...

Peter Lafosse (Owner and Co-Founder of Vector 35 Inc.)

Read More

Towards Automatically Generating a Sound and Complete Dataset for...

Aravind Machiry (UC Santa Barbara), Nilo Redini (UC Santa Barbara), Eric Gustafson (UC Santa Barbara), Hojjat Aghakhani (UC Santa Barbara), Christopher Kruegel (UC Santa Barbara), Giovanni Vigna (UC Santa Barbara)

Read More

The Droid is in the Details: Environment-aware Evasion of...

Brian Kondracki (Stony Brook University), Babak Amin Azad (Stony Brook University), Najmeh Miramirkhani (Stony Brook University), Nick Nikiforakis (Stony Brook University)

Read More

Is Your Firmware Real or Re-Hosted? A case study...

Abraham A. Clements, Logan Carpenter, William A. Moeglein (Sandia National Laboratories), Christopher Wright (Purdue University)

Read More