Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

Let’s Authenticate: Automated Certificates for User Authentication

James Conners (Brigham Young University), Corey Devenport (Brigham Young University), Stephen Derbidge (Brigham Young University), Natalie Farnsworth (Brigham Young University), Kyler Gates (Brigham Young University), Stephen Lambert (Brigham Young University), Christopher McClain (Brigham Young University), Parker Nichols (Brigham Young University), Daniel Zappala (Brigham Young University)

Read More

Evaluating Disassembly Ground Truth Through Dynamic Tracing (abstract)

Lambang Akbar (National University of Singapore), Yuancheng Jiang (National University of Singapore), Roland H.C. Yap (National University of Singapore), Zhenkai Liang (National University of Singapore), Zhuohao Liu (National University of Singapore)

Read More

ROV-MI: Large-Scale, Accurate and Efficient Measurement of ROV Deployment

Wenqi Chen (Tsinghua University), Zhiliang Wang (Tsinghua University), Dongqi Han (Tsinghua University), Chenxin Duan (Tsinghua University), Xia Yin (Tsinghua University), Jiahai Yang (Tsinghua University), Xingang Shi (Tsinghua University)

Read More

Finding 1-Day Vulnerabilities in Trusted Applications using Selective Symbolic...

Marcel Busch (Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg), Kalle Dirsch (Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg)

Read More