Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

datAFLow: Towards a Data-Flow-Guided Fuzzer

Adrian Herrera (Australian National University), Mathias Payer (EPFL), Antony Hosking (Australian National University)

Read More

HeadStart: Efficiently Verifiable and Low-Latency Participatory Randomness Generation at...

Hsun Lee (National Taiwan University), Yuming Hsu (National Taiwan University), Jing-Jie Wang (National Taiwan University), Hao Cheng Yang (National Taiwan University), Yu-Heng Chen (National Taiwan University), Yih-Chun Hu (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), Hsu-Chun Hsiao (National Taiwan University)

Read More

Clarion: Anonymous Communication from Multiparty Shuffling Protocols

Saba Eskandarian (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Dan Boneh (Stanford University)

Read More

Phishing awareness and education – When to best remind?

Benjamin Maximilian Berens (SECUSO, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology), Katerina Dimitrova, Mattia Mossano (SECUSO, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology), Melanie Volkamer (SECUSO, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)

Read More