Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

RVPLAYER: Robotic Vehicle Forensics by Replay with What-if Reasoning

Hongjun Choi (Purdue University), Zhiyuan Cheng (Purdue University), Xiangyu Zhang (Purdue University)

Read More

DRAGON: Predicting Decompiled Variable Data Types with Learned Confidence...

Caleb Stewart, Rhonda Gaede, Jeffrey Kulick (University of Alabama in Huntsville)

Read More

DRAWN APART: A Device Identification Technique based on Remote...

Tomer Laor (Ben-Gurion Univ. of the Negev), Naif Mehanna (Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inria), Antonin Durey (Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inria), Vitaly Dyadyuk (Ben-Gurion Univ. of the Negev), Pierre Laperdrix (Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inria), Clémentine Maurice (Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inria), Yossi Oren (Ben-Gurion Univ. of the Negev), Romain Rouvoy (Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inria / IUF), Walter Rudametkin…

Read More

Get a Model! Model Hijacking Attack Against Machine Learning...

Ahmed Salem (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Michael Backes (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Yang Zhang (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security)

Read More