Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

DRAGON: Predicting Decompiled Variable Data Types with Learned Confidence...

Caleb Stewart, Rhonda Gaede, Jeffrey Kulick (University of Alabama in Huntsville)

Read More

Blaze: A Framework for Interprocedural Binary Analysis

Matthew Revelle, Matt Parker, Kevin Orr (Kudu Dynamics)

Read More

Similarity Metric Method for Binary Basic Blocks of Cross-Instruction...

Xiaochuan Zhang (Artificial Intelligence Research Center, National Innovation Institute of Defense Technology), Wenjie Sun (State Key Laboratory of Mathematical Engineering and Advanced Computing), Jianmin Pang (State Key Laboratory of Mathematical Engineering and Advanced Computing), Fudong Liu (State Key Laboratory of Mathematical Engineering and Advanced Computing), Zhen Ma (State Key Laboratory of Mathematical Engineering and Advanced…

Read More