Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

Characterizing the Adoption of Security.txt Files and their Applications...

William Findlay (Carleton University) and AbdelRahman Abdou (Carleton University)

Read More

Evaluating Disassembly Ground Truth Through Dynamic Tracing (abstract)

Lambang Akbar (National University of Singapore), Yuancheng Jiang (National University of Singapore), Roland H.C. Yap (National University of Singapore), Zhenkai Liang (National University of Singapore), Zhuohao Liu (National University of Singapore)

Read More

DeepSight: Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning Through Deep...

Phillip Rieger (Technical University of Darmstadt), Thien Duc Nguyen (Technical University of Darmstadt), Markus Miettinen (Technical University of Darmstadt), Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi (Technical University of Darmstadt)

Read More

datAFLow: Towards a Data-Flow-Guided Fuzzer

Adrian Herrera (Australian National University), Mathias Payer (EPFL), Antony Hosking (Australian National University)

Read More