Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

Analyzing and Creating Malicious URLs: A Comparative Study on...

Vincent Drury (IT-Security Research Group, RWTH Aachen University), Rene Roepke (Learning Technologies Research Group, RWTH Aachen University), Ulrik Schroeder (Learning Technologies Research Group, RWTH Aachen University), Ulrike Meyer (IT-Security Research Group, RWTH Aachen University)

Read More

Detecting CAN Masquerade Attacks with Signal Clustering Similarity

Pablo Moriano (Oak Ridge National Laboratory), Robert A. Bridges (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) and Michael D. Iannacone (Oak Ridge National Laboratory)

Read More

LogicMEM: Automatic Profile Generation for Binary-Only Memory Forensics via...

Zhenxiao Qi (UC Riverside), Yu Qu (UC Riverside), Heng Yin (UC Riverside)

Read More

JMPscare: Introspection for Binary-Only Fuzzing

Dominik Maier, Lukas Seidel (TU Berlin)

Read More