Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

dewolf: Improving Decompilation by leveraging User Surveys

Steffen Enders, Eva-Maria C. Behner, Niklas Bergmann, Mariia Rybalka, Elmar Padilla (Fraunhofer FKIE, Germany), Er Xue Hui, Henry Low, Nicholas Sim (DSO National Laboratories, Singapore)

Read More

Cross-Language Attacks

Samuel Mergendahl (MIT Lincoln Laboratory), Nathan Burow (MIT Lincoln Laboratory), Hamed Okhravi (MIT Lincoln Laboratory)

Read More

SoK: A Proposal for Incorporating Gamified Cybersecurity Awareness in...

June De La Cruz (INSPIRIT Lab, University of Denver), Sanchari Das (INSPIRIT Lab, University of Denver)

Read More

B2R2: Building an Efficient Front-End for Binary Analysis

Minkyu Jung (KAIST), Soomin Kim (KAIST), HyungSeok Han (KAIST), Jaeseung Choi (KAIST), Sang Kil Cha (KAIST)

Read More