Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

Blaze: A Framework for Interprocedural Binary Analysis

Matthew Revelle, Matt Parker, Kevin Orr (Kudu Dynamics)

Read More

First, Fuzz the Mutants

Alex Groce (Northern Arizona Univerisity), Goutamkumar Kalburgi (Northern Arizona Univerisity), Claire Le Goues (Carnegie Mellon University), Kush Jain (Carnegie Mellon University), Rahul Gopinath (Saarland University)

Read More

SpiralSpy: Exploring a Stealthy and Practical Covert Channel to...

Zhengxiong Li (University at Buffalo, SUNY), Baicheng Chen (University at Buffalo), Xingyu Chen (University at Buffalo), Huining Li (SUNY University at Buffalo), Chenhan Xu (University at Buffalo, SUNY), Feng Lin (Zhejiang University), Chris Xiaoxuan Lu (University of Edinburgh), Kui Ren (Zhejiang University), Wenyao Xu (SUNY Buffalo)

Read More

DRAGON: Predicting Decompiled Variable Data Types with Learned Confidence...

Caleb Stewart, Rhonda Gaede, Jeffrey Kulick (University of Alabama in Huntsville)

Read More