Anup K Ghosh

One of the hardest challenges for companies and their officers is determining how much to spend on cybersecurity and the appropriate allocation of those resources. Security “investments” are a cost on the ledger, and as such, companies do not want to spend more on security than they have to. The question most boards have is “how much security is enough?” and “how good is our security program?” Most CISOs and SOC teams have a hard time answering these questions for a lack of data and framework to measure risk and compare with other similar sized companies. This paper presents a data-driven practical approach to assessing and scoring cybersecurity risk that can be used to allocate resources efficiently a nd mitigate cybersecurity risk in areas that need it the most. We combine both static and dynamic measures of risk to give a composite score more indicative of cybersecurity risk over static measures alone.

View More Papers

RCABench: Open Benchmarking Platform for Root Cause Analysis

Keisuke Nishimura, Yuichi Sugiyama, Yuki Koike, Masaya Motoda, Tomoya Kitagawa, Toshiki Takatera, Yuma Kurogome (Ricerca Security, Inc.)

Read More

SOCs lead AI adoption: Transitioning Lessons to the C-Suite

Eric Dull, Drew Walsh, Scott Riede (Deloitte and Touche)

Read More

He-HTLC: Revisiting Incentives in HTLC

Sarisht Wadhwa (Duke University), Jannis Stoeter (Duke University), Fan Zhang (Duke University, Yale University), Kartik Nayak (Duke University)

Read More

MyTEE: Own the Trusted Execution Environment on Embedded Devices

Seungkyun Han (Chungnam National University), Jinsoo Jang (Chungnam National University)

Read More