Andrew Searles (University of California Irvine), Renascence Tarafder Prapty (University of California Irvine), Gene Tsudik (University of California Irvine)

Since 2003, CAPTCHAS have been widely used as a barrier against bots, while simultaneously annoying great multitudes of users worldwide. As the use of CAPTCHAS grew, techniques to defeat or bypass them kept improving. In response, CAPTCHAS themselves evolved in terms of sophistication and diversity, becoming increasingly difficult to solve for both bots and humans. Given this long-standing and still-ongoing arms race, it is important to investigate usability, solving performance, and user perceptions of modern CAPTCHAS. In this work, we do so via a large scale (over 3,600 distinct users) 13-month realworld user study and post-study survey. The study, conducted at a large public university, is based on a live account creation and password recovery service with currently prevalent CAPTCHA type: reCAPTCHAv2.

Results show that, with more attempts, users improve in solving checkbox CAPTCHAS. For website developers and user study designers, results indicate that the website context, i.e., whether the service is password recovery or account creation, directly influences (with statistically significant differences) CAPTCHA solving times. We consider the impact of participants’ major and education level, showing that certain majors exhibit better performance, while, in general, education level has a direct impact on solving time. Unsurprisingly, we discover that participants find image CAPTCHAS to be annoying, while checkbox CAPTCHAS are perceived as easy. We also show that, rated via System Usability Scale (SUS), image CAPTCHAS are viewed as “OK”, while checkbox CAPTCHAS are viewed as “good”.

Finally, we also explore the cost and security of reCAPTCHAv2 and conclude that it comes at an immense cost and offers practically no security. Overall, we believe that this study’s results prompt a natural conclusion: reCAPTCHAv2 and similar reCAPTCHA technology should be deprecated.

View More Papers

What’s Done Is Not What’s Claimed: Detecting and Interpreting...

Chang Yue (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China), Kai Chen (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China), Zhixiu Guo (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China), Jun Dai, Xiaoyan Sun (Department of Computer Science, Worcester Polytechnic Institute), Yi Yang (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy…

Read More

DShield: Defending against Backdoor Attacks on Graph Neural Networks...

Hao Yu (National University of Defense Technology), Chuan Ma (Chongqing University), Xinhang Wan (National University of Defense Technology), Jun Wang (National University of Defense Technology), Tao Xiang (Chongqing University), Meng Shen (Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China), Xinwang Liu (National University of Defense Technology)

Read More

Interventional Root Cause Analysis of Failures in Multi-Sensor Fusion...

Shuguang Wang (City University of Hong Kong), Qian Zhou (City University of Hong Kong), Kui Wu (University of Victoria), Jinghuai Deng (City University of Hong Kong), Dapeng Wu (City University of Hong Kong), Wei-Bin Lee (Information Security Center, Hon Hai Research Institute), Jianping Wang (City University of Hong Kong)

Read More

CASPR: Context-Aware Security Policy Recommendation

Lifang Xiao (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Hanyu Wang (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Aimin Yu (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Lixin Zhao (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Dan Meng (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Read More