Heng Li (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Zhiyuan Yao (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Bang Wu (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Cuiying Gao (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Teng Xu (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Wei Yuan (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Xiapu Luo (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)

Adversarial example techniques have been demonstrated to be highly effective against Android malware detection systems, enabling malware to evade detection with minimal code modifications. However, existing adversarial example techniques overlook the process of malware generation, thus restricting the applicability of adversarial example techniques. In this paper, we investigate piggybacked malware, a type of malware generated in bulk by piggybacking malicious code into popular apps, and combine it with adversarial example techniques. Given a malicious code segment (i.e., a rider), we can generate adversarial perturbations tailored to it and insert them into any carrier, enabling the resulting malware to evade detection. Through exploring the mechanism by which adversarial perturbation affects piggybacked malware code, we propose an adversarial piggybacked malware generation method, which comprises three modules: Malicious Rider Extraction, Adversarial Perturbation Generation, and Benign Carrier Selection. Extensive experiments have demonstrated that our method can efficiently generate a large volume of malware in a short period, and significantly increase the likelihood of evading detection. Our method achieved an average attack success rate (ASR) of 88.3% on machine learning-based detection models (e.g., Drebin and MaMaDroid), and an ASR of 76% and 92% on commercial engines Microsoft and Kingsoft, respectively. Furthermore, we have explored potential defenses against our adversarial piggybacked malware.

View More Papers

Five Word Password Composition Policy

Sirvan Almasi (Imperial College London), William J. Knottenbelt (Imperial College London)

Read More

Evaluating Machine Learning-Based IoT Device Identification Models for Security...

Eman Maali (Imperial College London), Omar Alrawi (Georgia Institute of Technology), Julie McCann (Imperial College London)

Read More

Onion Franking: Abuse Reports for Mix-Based Private Messaging

Matthew Gregoire (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Margaret Pierce (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Saba Eskandarian (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)

Read More

Understanding Influences on SMS Phishing Detection: User Behavior, Demographics,...

Daniel Timko (California State University San Marcos), Daniel Hernandez Castillo (California State University San Marcos), Muhammad Lutfor Rahman (California State University San Marcos)

Read More