Rock Stevens (University of Maryland), Josiah Dykstra (Independent Security Researcher), Wendy Knox Everette (Leviathan Security Group), James Chapman (Independent Security Researcher), Garrett Bladow (Dragos), Alexander Farmer (Independent Security Researcher), Kevin Halliday (University of Maryland), Michelle L. Mazurek (University of Maryland)

Digital security compliance programs and policies serve as powerful tools for protecting organizations' intellectual property, sensitive resources, customers, and employees through mandated security controls. Organizations place a significant emphasis on compliance and often conflate high compliance audit scores with strong security; however, no compliance standard has been systemically evaluated for security concerns that may exist even within fully-compliant organizations. In this study, we describe our approach for auditing three exemplar compliance standards that affect nearly every person within the United States: standards for federal tax information, credit card transactions, and the electric grid. We partner with organizations that use these standards to validate our findings within enterprise environments and provide first-hand narratives describing impact.

We find that when compliance standards are used literally as checklists --- a common occurrence, as confirmed by compliance experts --- their technical controls and processes are not always sufficient. Security concerns can exist even with perfect compliance. We identified 148 issues of varying severity across three standards; our expert partners assessed 49 of these issues and validated that 36 were present in their own environments and 10 could plausibly occur elsewhere. We also discovered that no clearly-defined process exists for reporting security concerns associated with compliance standards; we report on our varying levels of success in responsibly disclosing our findings and influencing revisions to the affected standards. Overall, our results suggest that auditing compliance standards can provide valuable benefits to the security posture of compliant organizations.

View More Papers

FlowPrint: Semi-Supervised Mobile-App Fingerprinting on Encrypted Network Traffic

Thijs van Ede (University of Twente), Riccardo Bortolameotti (Bitdefender), Andrea Continella (UC Santa Barbara), Jingjing Ren (Northeastern University), Daniel J. Dubois (Northeastern University), Martina Lindorfer (TU Wien), David Choffnes (Northeastern University), Maarten van Steen (University of Twente), Andreas Peter (University of Twente)

Read More

Finding Safety in Numbers with Secure Allegation Escrows

Venkat Arun (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), Aniket Kate (Purdue University), Deepak Garg (Max Planck Institute for Software Systems), Peter Druschel (Max Planck Institute for Software Systems), Bobby Bhattacharjee (University of Maryland)

Read More

Not All Coverage Measurements Are Equal: Fuzzing by Coverage...

Yanhao Wang (Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Xiangkun Jia (Pennsylvania State University), Yuwei Liu (Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Kyle Zeng (Arizona State University), Tiffany Bao (Arizona State University), Dinghao Wu (Pennsylvania State University), Purui Su (Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Read More

HotFuzz: Discovering Algorithmic Denial-of-Service Vulnerabilities Through Guided Micro-Fuzzing

William Blair (Boston University), Andrea Mambretti (Northeastern University), Sajjad Arshad (Northeastern University), Michael Weissbacher (Northeastern University), William Robertson (Northeastern University), Engin Kirda (Northeastern University), Manuel Egele (Boston University)

Read More