Jaewon Hur (Seoul National University), Juheon Yi (Nokia Bell Labs, Cambridge, UK), Cheolwoo Myung (Seoul National University), Sangyun Kim (Seoul National University), Youngki Lee (Seoul National University), Byoungyoung Lee (Seoul National University)

Sharing training data for deep learning raises critical concerns about data leakage, as third-party AI developers take full control over the data once it is handed over to them. The problem becomes even worse if the model trained using the data should be returned to the third-party AI developers - e.g., healthcare startup training its own model using the medical data rented from a hospital. In this case, the malicious developers can easily leak the training data through the model as he can construct an arbitrary data flow between them - e.g., directly encoding raw training data into the model, or stealthily biasing the model to resemble the training data. However, current model training frameworks do not provide any protection to prevent such training data leakage, allowing the untrusted AI developers to leak the data without any restriction.

This paper proposes DLBox, a new model training framework to minimize the attack vectors raised by untrusted AI developers. Since it is infeasible to completely prevent data leakage through the model, the goal of DLBox is to allow only a benign model training such that the data leakage through invalid paths are minimized. The key insight of DLBox is that the model training is a statistical process of learning common patterns from a dataset. Based on it, DLBox defines DGM-Rules, which determine whether a model training code from a developer is benign or not. Then, DLBox leverages confidential computing to redesign current model training framework, enforcing only DGM-Rules-based training. Therefore, untrusted AI developers are strictly limited to obtain only the benignly trained model, prohibited from intentionally leaking the data. We implemented the prototype of DLBox on PyTorch with AMD SEV-SNP, and demonstrated that DLBox eliminates large attack vectors by preventing previous attacks (e.g., data encoding, and gradient inversion) while imposing minimal performance overhead.

View More Papers

Attributing Open-Source Contributions is Critical but Difficult: A Systematic...

Jan-Ulrich Holtgrave (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Kay Friedrich (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Fabian Fischer (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Nicolas Huaman (Leibniz University Hannover), Niklas Busch (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Jan H. Klemmer (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Marcel Fourné (Paderborn University), Oliver Wiese (CISPA Helmholtz Center…

Read More

Secure IP Address Allocation at Cloud Scale

Eric Pauley (University of Wisconsin–Madison), Kyle Domico (University of Wisconsin–Madison), Blaine Hoak (University of Wisconsin–Madison), Ryan Sheatsley (University of Wisconsin–Madison), Quinn Burke (University of Wisconsin–Madison), Yohan Beugin (University of Wisconsin–Madison), Engin Kirda (Northeastern University), Patrick McDaniel (University of Wisconsin–Madison)

Read More

On-demand RFID: Improving Privacy, Security, and User Trust in...

Youngwook Do (JPMorganChase and Georgia Institute of Technology), Tingyu Cheng (Georgia Institute of Technology and University of Notre Dame), Yuxi Wu (Georgia Institute of Technology and Northeastern University), HyunJoo Oh(Georgia Institute of Technology), Daniel J. Wilson (Northeastern University), Gregory D. Abowd (Northeastern University), Sauvik Das (Carnegie Mellon University)

Read More

BrowserFM: A Feature Model-based Approach to Browser Fingerprint Analysis

Maxime Huyghe (Univ. Lille, Inria, CNRS, UMR 9189 CRIStAL), Clément Quinton (Univ. Lille, Inria, CNRS, UMR 9189 CRIStAL), Walter Rudametkin (Univ. Rennes, Inria, CNRS, UMR 6074 IRISA)

Read More