Zicong Gao (State Key Laboratory of Mathematical Engineering and Advanced Computing), Chao Zhang (Tsinghua University), Hangtian Liu (State Key Laboratory of Mathematical Engineering and Advanced Computing), Wenhou Sun (Tsinghua University), Zhizhuo Tang (State Key Laboratory of Mathematical Engineering and Advanced Computing), Liehui Jiang (State Key Laboratory of Mathematical Engineering and Advanced Computing), Jianjun Chen (Tsinghua…

IoT devices are often found vulnerable, i.e., untrusted inputs may trigger potential vulnerabilities and flow to sensitive operations in the firmware, which could cause severe damage. As such vulnerabilities are in general taint-style, a promising solution to find them is static taint analysis. However, existing solutions have limited efficiency and effectiveness. In this paper, we propose a new efficient and effective taint analysis solution, namely HermeScan, to discover such vulnerabilities, which utilizes reaching definition analysis (RDA) to conduct taint analysis and gets much fewer false negatives, false positives, and time costs. We have implemented a prototype of HermeScan and conducted a thorough evaluation on two datasets, i.e., one 0-day dataset with 30 latest firmware and one N-day dataset with 98 older firmware, and compared with two state-of-the art (SOTA) solutions, i.e., KARONTE and SaTC. In terms of effectiveness, HermeScan, SaTC, and KARONTE find 163, 32, and 0 vulnerabilities in the 0-day dataset respectively. In terms of accuracy, the true positive rates of HermeScan, SaTC, and KARONTE are 81%, 42%, and 0% in the 0-day dataset. In terms of efficiency, HermeScan is 7.5X and 3.8X faster than SaTC and KARONTE on average in finding 0-day vulnerabilities.

View More Papers

Benchmarking transferable adversarial attacks

Zhibo Jin (The University of Sydney), Jiayu Zhang (Suzhou Yierqi), Zhiyu Zhu, Huaming Chen (The University of Sydney)

Read More

Don't Interrupt Me – A Large-Scale Study of On-Device...

Marian Harbach (Google), Igor Bilogrevic (Google), Enrico Bacis (Google), Serena Chen (Google), Ravjit Uppal (Google), Andy Paicu (Google), Elias Klim (Google), Meggyn Watkins (Google), Balazs Engedy (Google)

Read More

Gradient Shaping: Enhancing Backdoor Attack Against Reverse Engineering

Rui Zhu (Indiana University Bloominton), Di Tang (Indiana University Bloomington), Siyuan Tang (Indiana University Bloomington), Zihao Wang (Indiana University Bloomington), Guanhong Tao (Purdue University), Shiqing Ma (University of Massachusetts Amherst), XiaoFeng Wang (Indiana University Bloomington), Haixu Tang (Indiana University, Bloomington)

Read More

DEMASQ: Unmasking the ChatGPT Wordsmith

Kavita Kumari (Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany), Alessandro Pegoraro (Technical University of Darmstadt), Hossein Fereidooni (Technische Universität Darmstadt), Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi (Technical University of Darmstadt)

Read More