Cheng Zhang (Hunan University), Yang Xu (Hunan University), Jianghao Tan (Hunan University), Jiajie An (Hunan University), Wenqiang Jin (Hunan University)

Clustered federated learning (CFL) serves as a promising framework to address the challenges of non-IID (non-Independent and Identically Distributed) data and heterogeneity in federated learning. It involves grouping clients into clusters based on the similarity of their data distributions or model updates. However, classic CFL frameworks pose severe threats to clients' privacy since the honest-but-curious server can easily know the bias of clients' data distributions (its preferences). In this work, we propose a privacy-enhanced clustered federated learning framework, MingledPie, aiming to resist against servers' preference profiling capabilities by allowing clients to be grouped into multiple clusters spontaneously. Specifically, within a given cluster, we mingled two types of clients in which a major type of clients share similar data distributions while a small portion of them do not (false positive clients). Such that, the CFL server fails to link clients' data preferences based on their belonged cluster categories. To achieve this, we design an indistinguishable cluster identity generation approach to enable clients to form clusters with a certain proportion of false positive members without the assistance of a CFL server. Meanwhile, training with mingled false positive clients will inevitably degrade the performances of the cluster's global model. To rebuild an accurate cluster model, we represent the mingled cluster models as a system of linear equations consisting of the accurate models and solve it. Rigid theoretical analyses are conducted to evaluate the usability and security of the proposed designs. In addition, extensive evaluations of MingledPie on six open-sourced datasets show that it defends against preference profiling attacks with an accuracy of 69.4% on average. Besides, the model accuracy loss is limited to between 0.02% and 3.00%.

View More Papers

“Do We Call Them That? Absolutely Not.”: Juxtaposing the...

Alexandra Klymenko (Technical University of Munich), Stephen Meisenbacher (Technical University of Munich), Luca Favaro (Technical University of Munich), and Florian Matthes (Technical University of Munich)

Read More

Crosstalk-induced Side Channel Threats in Multi-Tenant NISQ Computers

Ruixuan Li (Choudhury), Chaithanya Naik Mude (University of Wisconsin-Madison), Sanjay Das (The University of Texas at Dallas), Preetham Chandra Tikkireddi (University of Wisconsin-Madison), Swamit Tannu (University of Wisconsin, Madison), Kanad Basu (University of Texas at Dallas)

Read More

Try to Poison My Deep Learning Data? Nowhere to...

Yansong Gao (The University of Western Australia), Huaibing Peng (Nanjing University of Science and Technology), Hua Ma (CSIRO's Data61), Zhi Zhang (The University of Western Australia), Shuo Wang (Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Rayne Holland (CSIRO's Data61), Anmin Fu (Nanjing University of Science and Technology), Minhui Xue (CSIRO's Data61), Derek Abbott (The University of Adelaide, Australia)

Read More