Eduardo Chielle (New York University Abu Dhabi), Michail Maniatakos (New York University Abu Dhabi)

A Private Set Intersection (PSI) protocol is a cryptographic method allowing two parties, each with a private set, to determine the intersection of their sets without revealing any information about their entries except for the intersection itself. While extensive research has focused on PSI protocols, most studies have centered on scenarios where two parties possess sets of similar sizes, assuming a semi-honest threat model.
However, when the sizes of the parties' sets differ significantly, a generalized solution tends to underperform compared to a specialized one, as recent research has demonstrated. Additionally, conventional PSI protocols are typically designed for a single execution, requiring the entire protocol to be re-executed for each set intersection. This approach is suboptimal for applications such as URL denylisting and email filtering, which may involve multiple set intersections of small sets against a large set (e.g., one for each email received).
In this study, we propose a novel PSI protocol optimized for the recurrent setting where parties have unbalanced set sizes. We implement our protocol using Levelled Fully Homomorphic Encryption and Cuckoo hashing, and introduce several optimizations to ensure real-time performance. By utilizing the Microsoft SEAL library, we demonstrate that our protocol can perform private set intersections in 20 ms and 240 ms on 10 Gbps and 100 Mbps networks, respectively.
Compared to existing solutions, our protocol offers significant improvements, reducing set intersection times by one order of magnitude on slower networks and by two orders of magnitude on faster networks.

View More Papers

The Philosopher’s Stone: Trojaning Plugins of Large Language Models

Tian Dong (Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Minhui Xue (CSIRO's Data61), Guoxing Chen (Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Rayne Holland (CSIRO's Data61), Yan Meng (Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Shaofeng Li (Southeast University), Zhen Liu (Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Haojin Zhu (Shanghai Jiao Tong University)

Read More

”Who is Trying to Access My Account?” Exploring User...

Tongxin Wei (Nankai University), Ding Wang (Nankai University), Yutong Li (Nankai University), Yuehuan Wang (Nankai University)

Read More

On the Robustness of LDP Protocols for Numerical Attributes...

Xiaoguang Li (Xidian University, Purdue University), Zitao Li (Alibaba Group (U.S.) Inc.), Ninghui Li (Purdue University), Wenhai Sun (Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA)

Read More

What’s Done Is Not What’s Claimed: Detecting and Interpreting...

Chang Yue (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China), Kai Chen (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China), Zhixiu Guo (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China), Jun Dai, Xiaoyan Sun (Department of Computer Science, Worcester Polytechnic Institute), Yi Yang (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy…

Read More