Tongxin Wei (Nankai University), Ding Wang (Nankai University), Yutong Li (Nankai University), Yuehuan Wang (Nankai University)

Risk-based authentication (RBA) is gaining popularity and RBA notifications promptly alert users to protect their accounts from unauthorized access. Recent research indicates that users can identify legitimate login notifications triggered by themselves. However, little attention has been paid to whether RBA notifications triggered by non-account holders can effectively raise users' awareness of crises and prevent potential attacks. In this paper, we invite 258 online participants and 15 offline participants to explore users' perceptions, reactions, and expectations for three types of RBA notifications (i.e., RBA notifications triggered by correct passwords, incorrect passwords, and password resets).

The results show that over 90% of participants consider RBA notifications important. Users do not show significant differences in their feelings and behaviors towards the three types of RBA notifications, but they have distinct expectations for each type. Most participants feel suspicious, nervous, and anxious upon receiving the three types of RBA notifications not triggered by themselves. Consequently, users immediately review the full content of the notification. 46% of users suspect that RBA notifications might be phishing attempts, while categorizing them as potential phishing attacks or spam may lead to ineffective account protection. Despite these suspicions, 65% of users still log into their accounts to check for suspicious activities and take no further action if no abnormalities are found. Additionally, the current format of RBA notifications fails to gain users' trust and meet their expectations. Our findings indicate that RBA notifications need to provide more detailed information about suspicious access, offer additional security measures, and clearly explain the risks involved. Finally, we offer five design recommendations for RBA notifications to better mitigate potential risks and enhance account security.

View More Papers

Revisiting EM-based Estimation for Locally Differentially Private Protocols

Yutong Ye (Institute of software, Chinese Academy of Sciences & Zhongguancun Laboratory, Beijing, PR.China.), Tianhao Wang (University of Virginia), Min Zhang (Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Dengguo Feng (Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Read More

Evaluating LLMs Towards Automated Assessment of Privacy Policy Understandability

Keika Mori (Deloitte Tohmatsu Cyber LLC, Waseda University), Daiki Ito (Deloitte Tohmatsu Cyber LLC), Takumi Fukunaga (Deloitte Tohmatsu Cyber LLC), Takuya Watanabe (Deloitte Tohmatsu Cyber LLC), Yuta Takata (Deloitte Tohmatsu Cyber LLC), Masaki Kamizono (Deloitte Tohmatsu Cyber LLC), Tatsuya Mori (Waseda University, NICT, RIKEN AIP)

Read More

Siniel: Distributed Privacy-Preserving zkSNARK

Yunbo Yang (The State Key Laboratory of Blockchain and Data Security, Zhejiang University), Yuejia Cheng (Shanghai DeCareer Consulting Co., Ltd), Kailun Wang (Beijing Jiaotong University), Xiaoguo Li (College of Computer Science, Chongqing University), Jianfei Sun (School of Computing and Information Systems, Singapore Management University), Jiachen Shen (Shanghai Key Laboratory of Trustworthy Computing, East China Normal…

Read More

Fuzzing Space Communication Protocols

Stephan Havermans (IMDEA Software Institute), Lars Baumgaertner, Jussi Roberts, Marcus Wallum (European Space Agency), Juan Caballero (IMDEA Software Institute)

Read More